Uber’s New Same-Gender Ride Feature Raises Concerns Amid Ongoing Rideshare Sexual Assault Lawsuits

What Makes a Top Mass Tort Attorney? A Guide to Choosing the Right Litigator for Complex Claims

July 28, 2025

July 28, 2025

Uber’s Response to Rideshare Sexual Assault: A New Feature for Female Riders

In July 2025, Uber launched a new feature aimed at improving safety for women and nonbinary riders. The “Women Rider Preference” option allows riders to request women drivers and set this as a default setting in their app. Women drivers can also choose to only accept ride requests from other women.

This update is being piloted in Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Detroit, and is intended to reduce discomfort and increase retention among women drivers—who currently make up fewer than 25% of Uber’s driver base.

While many have welcomed the change as a step toward a safer experience, legal professionals and survivor advocates argue that this alone does not address the root causes of the ongoing rideshare sexual assault crisis.


Rideshare Sexual Assault: A Widespread and Ongoing Safety Crisis

Sexual assault in rideshare vehicles remains an alarming and underreported issue in the United States.

Uber’s most recent U.S. Safety Report, covering 2021–2022, revealed:

  • 2,717 reports of serious sexual assault or misconduct
  • 92% of accused individuals were drivers
  • The most commonly reported assaults involved non-consensual touching and sexual penetration

These numbers only reflect what was formally reported—many experts believe actual incidents are significantly higher, as sexual assault remains one of the most underreported crimes in the U.S.

Lyft has not issued a comparable safety report but has faced thousands of legal claims from survivors who allege similar misconduct.


Why Survivors Are Filing Rideshare Sexual Assault Lawsuits

Over the past several years, survivors have increasingly turned to the courts to hold rideshare companies accountable. In 2023, a federal judicial panel consolidated hundreds of lawsuits into a single proceeding, now known as the Uber Technologies, Passenger Sexual Assault Litigation (MDL No. 3084).

This multidistrict litigation (MDL) is based in San Francisco and currently includes over 2,300 claims from riders who say they were sexually assaulted by Uber drivers.

Plaintiffs argue that Uber:

  • Failed to properly vet and monitor drivers
  • Ignored or inadequately responded to previous misconduct reports
  • Did not implement basic safety features—such as same-gender ride matching—until years after assaults had already become widespread
  • Misled users with marketing that falsely implied guaranteed safety

In July 2025, a federal judge ruled that key product liability and negligence claims may proceed, even though some fraud-based claims were dismissed. The first trial in this litigation is set for December 8, 2025, and could shape the outcomes of thousands of other cases.


Legal Experts Say Uber’s New Feature Doesn’t Address Systemic Issues

Uber’s women-driver feature gives riders more choice, and for some survivors or at-risk individuals, that choice may bring additional peace of mind. However, experts warn against viewing this option as a comprehensive solution.

Several concerns remain:

  • Limited driver availability: Because there are relatively few women drivers, this feature won’t always be accessible—especially during peak hours or in rural areas.
  • Lack of enforcement: The feature relies on self-selection by drivers and may not prevent perpetrators from remaining on the platform.
  • Reactive, not proactive: Critics argue this move comes after years of legal pressure and public backlash rather than through a sincere, early commitment to safety.

Advocates emphasize that technological fixes alone cannot solve a deeply rooted safety problem, especially one involving corporate negligence and systemic oversight failures.


Overview of the Rideshare Sexual Assault Litigation in the U.S.

The rideshare sexual assault lawsuits currently being litigated represent one of the largest ongoing mass tort efforts against a U.S. technology company. While Uber is the primary focus of the MDL, Lyft is also facing similar lawsuits in multiple states.

The litigation centers on legal claims such as:

  • Negligent hiring and supervision
  • Failure to implement safety design features
  • Inadequate warning to users of known risks
  • Product liability for failing to build a safer platform

Many survivors are seeking not only financial compensation but also accountability and long-overdue systemic reform. The lawsuits argue that Uber had data, complaints, and the technological capability to reduce these risks—but did not act in time.


Where Are Most Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuits Being Filed?

The Uber rideshare assault MDL is based in California federal court, but plaintiffs have come from across the country, including:

  • California – where Uber is headquartered and where many of the early cases originated
  • Texas, Florida, and New York – high-usage states with multiple active suits
  • Illinois and Georgia – states where plaintiffs have alleged a pattern of misconduct

These cases demonstrate the national scale of the problem and the broad range of individuals affected. Survivors vary in age, background, and location—but many share the experience of feeling unheard or unsupported after reporting what happened.


What to Know If You’ve Experienced Rideshare Assault

Survivors of rideshare sexual assault often feel uncertain about what steps they can or should take. It’s important to know that:

  • You do not need a police report to pursue a civil claim.
  • Civil cases can often be filed confidentially, with your identity protected.
  • You may still be eligible even if the incident occurred several years ago, depending on your state’s statute of limitations.
  • Most attorneys in this area work on a contingency basis, meaning there are no upfront fees to explore your legal options.

You also don’t need to face this process alone. Many survivors find that even an initial legal consultation helps them better understand their rights and options, with no pressure to proceed unless they choose to.


The Path Forward: Reform Through Litigation and Awareness

The introduction of gender-based ride matching may be helpful for some users, but many experts argue that broader accountability and corporate transparency are still missing from the conversation. The current legal proceedings aim to push rideshare companies to take their responsibility to protect users far more seriously.

If successful, these lawsuits could lead to:

  • Improved background check processes
  • Mandatory driver training
  • Timely response to user complaints
  • In-app tools designed with survivor safety in mind
  • Greater transparency about incidents and company actions

By coming forward, survivors are not only seeking justice for themselves—they’re also driving meaningful change that may protect future riders.


If you or someone you care about experienced sexual assault during an Uber or Lyft ride, there are legal options available. Many survivors are learning they are not alone—and that they may still have time to file a confidential claim.